http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560 In forum General Investment Discussion en-us Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:43:17 -0700 Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:43:17 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/ Kudang SQL2RSS admin@slcapex.com webmaster@slcapex.com 60 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
That is all I am asking. I am not impugning Lindsay's honesty or integrity, I am only asking for third party verification for soemthing that is potentially damaging to anothers reputation and cause for delisting of a stock that was starting to come back a bit.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:26:30 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2743 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Cash Yiyuan ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:48:51 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2740 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
Posting of actual findings, even to a third party may be a TOS violation and yes TOS still applied here because the exchange operates in Second Life and there is not disclaimer here that CapEx provides to investors to give up that right.

So know, I am not at liberty to provide that information to a third party.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:38:37 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2739 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
But, science is about hypothesis and theory and repeatable experiments.

If it is necessary, I would like to ask Lindsay if she would be willing to provide the data that she obtained from SLCAPEX (and she obtained that as a non officer of the exchange but that is another matter for another forum if anyone thinks that it is important enough) to some neutral third party to verify her findings on the SAL=ALLEN conjecture.

I am not putting this forward in a negative way, I just think in light of Beck’s Disclaimer, where he had NO mention of why AIG was really delisted, that we, as interested parties in all of Allen's adventures, should require independent verification of Lindsay's findings.

I would nominate Marc Attenborough (sp??, sorry if I massacred it) as an independent party because he has already demonstrated his trustworthiness by stepping down from Inc as CEO. Not because he had something to hide, but because it would reflect in a non positive way on his RL existence, which he fully admitted and explained! I think a lot of us can identify with that.)

So, Lindsay, are you willing to give your data to a third party, to verify your results?

Of course, Allen's anticipated response later today may make me look like a fool, but that isn't a first! If so, then I am a fool and I will walk away willingly while everybody has a good laugh at my expense! Hell, if I can make people feel better in this whole soap opera, I am happy! It is SL after all!

I just want clarification and scientific proof to the allegations. At least some proof of a theory.

If Allen confesses then that works as well. That is not only proof to a theorem then it is a fact and everything will be copasetic! At least we will know what we are dealing with and can go from there.




in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:00:30 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2731 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:25:57 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2729 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Enky Nakamura ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:37:18 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2724 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Valerian Dryke ]]> Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:29:59 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2708 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:34:00 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2692 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
Arbitrage, were you not reimbursed by Sal Ackland when you were first scammed?

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by 7736237 Paine ]]> Sun, 23 Sep 2007 18:32:21 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2689 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
I think this answer sucks. You "purchased" the exchange, of which the above, mentioned customers are already part of, and whose investments you profit from. When you bought Allen's exchange you bought Allen's customer base! While we did not have a say in the "sale" from "Allen" to "JTF", you are effectively pooping on us with this look of disdain on your face while pontificating that WE are all being greedy.

Furthermore, both slcapex and allenvest sites are still nearly identical. Most pages on both sites still have not changed at all though both sites have officially changed names and "parted ways".

One could just as easily argue YOU were Sal and this was a warped plan to sucker everyone out of L$. Let's all get real in here and stop being such a bunch of rumor mongers, because how is any of this going to help us? Is this your way of further devaluing the investments, whatever form they may be, so there is less to pay back? Because someone WILL pay us back, because THIS is breaking the camel's back. I have had enough of this nonsense with the various administrators being a bunch of pirates!

Did all the scam artists wake up one morning and think, "gee, eBay is gonna catch up to us any day now, with our selling false promises and what not, I think we'll go into a game and rip people off in there!"? Divide and conquer here has taken on a whole, new meaning.

We are told this is not a soap opera, then why does it feel that way from the top down? You make me sick to my stomach, you fake bankers and locker room brokers!

Until you guys show a little partiality to your entire customer base, and stop pounding your OWN chests, you will continue to be suspect in my eyes.

My advise to anyone else who cares, is to GET OUT. If they deign to pay back even a pence, take it and RUN. Do not get involved in the next demonstration. These people do not care about us. They do not care about our "investments". They don't even care about "getting even". Chances are this is all a distraction for the next, big move. They only care about themselves. It's not like real life, it's WORSE.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Ben Shirakawa ]]> Sun, 23 Sep 2007 10:06:27 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2644 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
The reason why I am passionate about the subject is that I stand to loose a sum that is considerable to me and perhaps even you too. I feel for anyone who is this same position. I will take the lumps as I made the desicion to invest. I am also a bit upset because we were in the middle of transforming Allenvest into a great new community and now that is in question. I just want to make sure that the Capex management is sure of their findings. That's all.

Thank you for responding Arb. You can bet if all that comes to light establishes that Allen is indeed Sal I will be the first to champion action towards recovering AIG shareholder, Land Fund, and Partnership Interests from him. In the meantime though, the future payments should not be made to Allen, but should be held in escrow for the victims. This is really AIG Shareholder money after all.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Ashleigh Wade ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:11:43 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2583 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
It has suprised a lot of people, and my first tought was what happen here. Who and when was "elected" to delist this company? Who is in charge here?

I believe, there are really good reasons why this companys are delisted from your point of view. And the disclosure Bogart will present, hopefully give enough answer for this.

There is a proverb in german, translated to english:

"Better a end with frighten, as a frighten without end"

If it was the right decision will show the future.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Kubi Beam ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:04:42 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2582 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
-Does a business not have the ability to take swift action when it deems it necessary to protect the interest and integrity of its business? And in doing so, does it not deserve the time to do its due diligence and put together a formal report to disclose to the public?

-We are a service provider. If we have a customer that consistently slanders and ridicules our business and methods publicly, should we not have the right to discontinue our service to that business? Those who believe this to be a clash of ego please show me one negative statement that I have posted about our customer. We have been professional from Day 1, and have made many private attempts to alleviate the animosity. At some point, shouldn't a business have the conviction to stand up for itself and discontinue business with any customers that does not serve to protect its long term interest? Or should it stand there in humility and silence while waiting until the customer deems that they no longer need the service and walks away?

-We have noted that we would bail out AIG shareholders from our own pockets with SLCX shares, yet, no one has taken notice. Nor have they noticed the losses and damages that we have taken in this entire ordeal, from Sal to CYB to AIG to BNT. Instead, they would rather stake claims to what was a private deal between JTF and Allen. However, they have failed to realize something. According to AIG's financials, (AVIX Sale Payments 1,275,000) AIG received payments from us (close to 1.5M to be exact), yet, has any of that went out to them? Shouldn't they be seeking money that DOES belong to them, and not money that DOESN"T belong to them? What makes them so certain that they will see the rest of the payments when it is made? Since when is it our responsibility to take care of another businesses' customers, as well as investments they did not make with us?

People are so quick to pound their chest and pocket the money when they profit from a good investment, but seeks bail outs and protection from outside parties while blaming and demanding repayment when they make a bad investment. If only the investment world was that easy.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arbitrage Wise ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 09:23:02 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2579 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Dezmond Martinek ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:01:39 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2569 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Valerian Dryke ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:41:55 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2567 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Valerian Dryke ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:32:37 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2564 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
The simplest way to do is to sum up the amount Allen owes to everyone, dividing the amount of everyone on the total, and apply that percentage to the 7 millions that we all share equally. If there is less for everyone than their initial amount, at least they get partial refund. If there is more, it could be considered as interests.

That's just my opinion. And oh -- that hypothesis above regarding Arb is just that. :)

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Valerian Dryke ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:29:40 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2563 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
I am just wondering why, if Sal disappeared with so much money, did Allen raise capital from day one? Why not just use the stolen funds to build his exchange then invite the public in? Why would he go through the liquidity crises and not use the confiscated funds to make his ops run smoother and ensure that his scheme continues? Also, Sal never bought a Sim that I can recall. Why would Allen, if Sal, tie down roots and try to build his own village? Sal only rented from what I understand. It's all so weird. If this is true then I am in the same boat as Mael. I hope that Capex management is completely sure that this is the case otherwise you are ruining someones business and SL.

Also, Why boot him? If he had taken so much from Arb then why not try to enforce your notoraized ID policy retroactively first so you could get his RL ID to go after him? Didn't Sal take like 600K from Arb?

And why do we have to wait till Monday to get an official statement?

I would like to know as well what will happen with the purchase money owed to the AIG shareholders. I will have to trust in Capex management to make sure that the FULL payment owed is distributed amongst the AIG shareholders. Otherwise you are being no better than Sal was.....


in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Ashleigh Wade ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:10:14 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2562 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Gill Handrick ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:02:04 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2561 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Servme Nakamura ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 07:02:01 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2560 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
I'll wait to see how the 7 Million that Arb owes Allen/Sal/Whatever is handled before I come to any final conclusions.




in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:31:03 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2553 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
This is just too convenient. However I stand by my prior statement. I am standing down.

My Reply: I did testing on the hosting providers for AVIX and for VCE because it was originally hosted by Ackland. The numbers didn't match. Unfortunately, I never had direct, raw, ip data for Allen or Ackland the user to work with and compare, much as I would have wanted to. My understanding is that it'd be almost a TOS violation to try and get this data inside of SL without player consent and I know Ackland would not have consented for comparison with his attempts to evade identification. His number he gave me at the time was a new york number verified by verizon's white pages service as a land line at their directory website. Sources in the investment community informed me that from what they knew of the VCE incident he was from michigan. I did talk to him on at least two occasions, perhaps as many as 5 as I sometimes had to call him in an attempt to find out why he was late to some old AVIX board meetings. I never said I called him many times. I said I talked to him. And yes, he had me fully deceived if what I am hearing is true. I used the best available remote verification possible. I even briefly viewed a go-daddy account page with Allen's avatar in sl in the foreground upon it. If Sal is Al and I can only trust what Lindsay has told me and I believe her to be truthful, then he completely forged his identity work down to address. I no longer have such information on file as it's been so long and I no longer work for the exchange, plus, I had no desire to risk TOS violation by keeping someone's private data in my account inventory.

I do not apologize as I did the best I could do with what I had and if it were a bank they probably would have accepted his ID as credible except for when they did the SSN checks. There'd be no way I'd ask someone in SL for their SSN either.

The fault lay with the party that has morally failed this community, whomever that may be.. in this case whoever Sal is or possibly Allen. At this point, not having access to the information that others do, I really cannot say much of anything in regards to liability. Whoever they are, I hope Lindsay does find a way to nail them to the wall.

In second life there are no absolutes in anything regarding ID, and I never said he was absolutely not Sal. I've only said that all the data I had indicated he was not Sal, and that was accurate. Anyone stating otherwise is misquoting me. This is why I'm glad the exchange has moved to using a policy of asking for faxed identification, even though that also has the potential for forgery.

There is only so much you can do without walking up to their door and shaking their hand.. or risking a violation of LL TOS. Neither of these options were possible for myself.

A matter of fact, this was the first line of that said article:

"I have spoken to Allen by landline phone. My methods aren't 100%, but they are as good as can be managed without calling in the FBI, Police, or a Private Investigator."

I knew there was room for me to be wrong. However, when you're a new exchange there's a lot of other motives for people to be trying to tear your boss a new one and everything I had in my files told me this guy was who he said he was. The article further discusses my methods, but nowhere do I claim absoluteness of certainty of fact.

The article, along with the information, still lies in my company archives for reference. It was also written in a vacuum of any credible data from an independent source that would counter-act the data obtained during the opening days of a new, competitive, exchange. I had even less data when working for AVIX as LIndsay has now for CAPEX. The programmers had access to the back end, I was only able to access that which was critical to my work so I could not see that Sal Ackland even had an account or whether or not his or her ip matched any others.

So far as I could tell, no smoke.. no fire. The only time I knew something was amiss was when he was going to do the attempted merger with failing Ginko. Up until that point and shortly thereafter, AVIX'd been one of the best exchanges I had traded on. Since then.. not so much and it's not management's fault as it is economics and the standard crooks that apparently must come with the SL finance community. My perspective on the overall markets has not been positive of late. I won't go into more here, economics is the subject of the many articles I'm writing for the news agencies by which I'm employed.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Maelstrom Baphomet ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:39:11 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2538 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Isegrim Nikolaidis ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:35:42 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2536 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Isegrim Nikolaidis ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:26:37 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2535 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
It matters IMHO because if this is about powertripping ego's, it is not reason enough to make shareholders/clients
victims and they should go and solve this like adults.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Isegrim Nikolaidis ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:07:36 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2532 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:58:51 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2529 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
Bye

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Enky Nakamura ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:57:09 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2528 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:55:09 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2527 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
A stock swap won't cut it, if that 7 Million is not to be paid to Allen, because he is now conveniently Sal, then it must be paid to creditors, depositors, partners, and shareholders. I think I saw the correct order in another post, either in this forum or the AIG forum.

Arb cannot hope to keep this money and the exchange without being part of a fraud. Let's have an accounting and let's have it soon! Like within the next 24 hours. I agree with Cliff, MONDAY don't cut it!!!



in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:42:46 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2524 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
What Lindsay is not saying is that right now there is real-life technical information to support this. Not only random people checking transaction IPs of different avatars. Sorry.

And yes, Maelstrom did post before you here.

Xavier Mohr

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by AEBank Dagger ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:42:32 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2523 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
When did delisting become voluntary?


in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Cliff Eclipse ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:37:53 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2522 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
Till Monday?

I can not even comment.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Cliff Eclipse ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:33:21 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2521 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
"...he is not happy here so management did not want to hold him where he is not happy."

How long has Bogart Beck been in control that he would have a working relationship with any present CEO? He made a decision to delist a company after sitting behind his desk for 4 days? Is this a "blame it on the new guy" ploy? Arbitrage has no answer. Lindsay gave an answer? Xavier has no answer either, nor do any of the employees asked on the floor at Capex. No one knows an answer why a company was delisted preventing any further growth for stockholders? Except Bogart? And we are waiting till Monday?

"It was not a mutual agreement but it was more of the straw that broke the camels back."

IT WAS...WHAT??? Official or non, this excuse for delisting a company remains unanswered. Are we waiting till Monday still?

All I have, all my friends and future stockholders have are questions. I keep reminding them the stock was on the rise when the opportunity was taken out of their grasp.

This is commerce?


in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Cliff Eclipse ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:30:58 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2520 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
I do agree it seems things came full circle at the exact same time. If you only knew what I have dealt with in the last 24 hours relating to SL. We have angered the SL gods or something...

But please do note, I have NO decision making power in delistments or even halts. I am an avenue of information and a logical sleuth being an advisor. I present what I find and others make the decisions based on that.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:05:08 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2519 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:55:54 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2518 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
This is just too convenient. However I stand by my prior statement. I am standing down.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:55:17 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2517 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
IP addresses don't lie either as the numbers are routed directly through the ISP.

As far as BNT, I have no authority in the delisting of any company here. I am not the CEO or President of CapEx.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:52:48 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2516 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
I find it interesting that you guys chose to do this at the time that Mael has taken a short leave of abscence to tend to RL affairs. By the time he gets back to disclaim your "findings" it will be too late!

This is a new low for the exchanges.

I will only believe this tripe when and if Mael states it personally. I hope others who have followed this saga from the beginning push back on this nonsense.

As far as your reasons for delisting BNT, you have violated your own personal ethics by letting personality clashes interfere with business. It is no secret that you and Int detest each other. You have finally had your revenge.


in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Arnaud Villota ]]> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 00:49:34 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2515 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Maelstrom Baphomet ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:30:16 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2512 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:05:53 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2511 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560





in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Isegrim Nikolaidis ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:02:10 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2510 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:55:12 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2508 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
SL CapEx is not a soap opera and not a daycare. No one asks anyone to agree with everything but there still should be some level of respect. Agree to disagree so to speak. BNTs unhappiness with the exchange has been long standing as they attempted to delist voluntary several times previous but were denied entry by other exchanges.

At this point SL CapEx wants BNT to know that they have options and are released from trading here since they are so unhappy with management as well as the financial statement principals amoung other things. It's not sheer competition because competition is healthy in any business. I do apologize that the shareholders got caught in the backlash but in the long run, the constant bickering between BNT and management was not helping.

I personally wish BNT the best of luck in their new exchange. There is a ton in the market to be covered.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:41:40 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2507 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
Well the reasons for delisting AIG seems pretty clear, but the reason for BNT delistment is not so clear. Does BNT wish to leave on a voluntairy basis or is it some how forced to.

Because it sounds like they are parting on mutual agreement.



in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Isegrim Nikolaidis ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:34:40 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2506 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:30:01 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2505 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by King Broome ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:29:33 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2504 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by King Broome ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:29:33 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2503 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560
AIG -

I troll the forums of course as an official forum mod and I ran across the thread about the AIG ATMs. Considering current issues, I conducted a bit of research and came across the transaction history that was imported into SL CapEx for avatar Sal Ackland.

It has long been up in the air whether Investor Allen and Sal Ackland were the same person. I confirmed this today as the transactions history logs IP address and both IP addresses ping to the same longitude and latitude.

Investor Allen does not live in New York. He resides in the same city as Sal Ackland. Coincidence? Not a chance, considering other registered avatars of AMD management come from the same IP address of the vicinity.

Investor Allen was delisted due to extreme lies to the exchange and to the market. RL information provided was a lie and if many remember, Sal Ackland owes a lot of people a lot of money and this will explain the disappearing acts and the fraud.

Bottom line here: Investor Allen = Sal Ackland and other unconfirmed alts involved in the VCE scandal. If I were to do a Rule 144 they would be the exact IP address.

SL CapEx is working on a complete plan to assist AIG stockholders. Particulars are not available as staff was unable to delve into this right away.

BNT -

After repeated attempts to create a positive relationship with BNT, CapEx management feel like it is best to part ways before more damage between the two can occur. BNT has publicly defamed the exchange on several occasions making it known that he is not happy here so management did not want to hold him where he is not happy.

The Anticapistan Stock Exchange should be rolling out soon and that will give investors a chance to invest again once his new system is up and running. No accounts have been frozen and such and Intlibber is free to trade as usual but the BNT ticker has been removed.

The action is nothing personal but was needed in order to move forward as repeated attempts to make amends have failed.

in topic The Unofficial Reason for the Recent Delistings by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:04:03 -0600 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/560/2501