http://slcapex.com/forums/browse/suggest Suggestions and discussion for SLCapex site improvements en-us Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:53:46 -0700 Fri, 03 Sep 2010 06:53:46 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/ Kudang SQL2RSS admin@slcapex.com webmaster@slcapex.com 60 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
I cleared your other ticket

I will have is done shortly

Thank you

in topic Customer service by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:05:03 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21197 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
in topic Customer service by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:35:08 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21193 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
waiting for your additional comment on my support ticket #1964

Thanks

in topic Customer service by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:15:34 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21187 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2911
Thanks in advance for your quick response to my support ticket.

in topic I have left a comment on Ticket Id: 1972 by Andy Grant ]]> Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:11:19 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2911/21184 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
Muchos grazias senior!


in topic Customer service by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:55:28 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21176 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
Have a happy trading day!

-Scott

in topic Customer service by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:50:51 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21175 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
I got your response on the BDVRHolding avatar, now i still have a ticket open under my own avatar. Could you respond to that as well please?

P.S. I also left a new message under the BDVR avatar, so look there again please :)

Mr. Pain in the arse :D

in topic Customer service by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:50:53 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21174 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
in topic Customer service by Fatimah Iramesius ]]> Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:50:11 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21173 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
thank you

in topic Customer service by Scott Nestler ]]> Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:19:58 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21172 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
Thanks in advance,
Alain

in topic Customer service by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:26:48 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21171 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
Thank you

in topic Customer service by Scott Nestler ]]> Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:51:46 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21169 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909
I get a very swift response from Scott every time i open a new ticket, but every time when i add an additional comment to the ticket... no one ever gets back to me. Can this be fixed?

Thanks,
Alain

in topic Customer service by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:14 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2909/21167 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2894
Thank you,

Scott

in topic Page wording.... by Scott Nestler ]]> Mon, 03 May 2010 20:27:36 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2894/21082 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
Anyone else?

in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Scott Nestler ]]> Mon, 03 May 2010 13:02:46 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21081 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Mon, 03 May 2010 09:54:06 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21080 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2894 Noticed, still shows "Avix":

http://www.slcapex.com/pages/subaccounts

:)

in topic Page wording.... by Mystic Handrick ]]> Mon, 03 May 2010 03:02:51 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2894/21079 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
Thank you,

Scott

in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Scott Nestler ]]> Sun, 02 May 2010 18:39:50 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21078 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2891
If your willing to write up the spec I am willing to submit to the programmer.

You know my email addy...

in topic System Updates by Scott Nestler ]]> Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:38:23 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2891/21063 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2891
Don't foget the Ford Edelman AMP& AMP& in the forums ;)

in topic System Updates by Ashleigh Wade ]]> Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:23:21 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2891/21062 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2891
The first improvement you will see is that the home page will not only be showing you today's volume but a history of market volume, the last 30 days, 60 days and so on.

Also, I have asked the programmer to look into extending the "order book" as suggested in the forums in the last few weeks.

If there is anything else that you want that will help increase our market volume please just ask.

Thank you,

Scott

in topic System Updates by Scott Nestler ]]> Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:56:31 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2891/21061 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
Its one of those things i really like.

in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Andy Grant ]]> Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:50:55 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21045 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
I personally do not see the benefit of seperate line items, but I want to only do this change once.

Thanks,

Scott

in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:27:58 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21044 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Andy Grant ]]> Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:53:02 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21042 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
"SELECT price FROM companies LIMIT 10"


delete the "LIMIT 10" and presto!

in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Itchy Gamba ]]> Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:02:26 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21040 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
The only way i ever get a benefit of the 'feature' that only displays 10 orders is by creating tons of 1 share orders to hide support/resistance from others.


in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Andy Grant ]]> Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:34:45 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21039 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
That data is only available to the programmer, we purposely do not give ourselves access to that data to prevent manipulating the system.

Does anyone else have thoughts on this?

Thanks,

Scott


in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:09:58 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21037 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885
one thing that as of late has really started to annoy me, is the buy and sell order display screen. As it only displays the top 10 orders it has become rather easy for folks to manipulate with it and artificially raise or lower the sell price for stocks. In this sense the ISE format works better, as you can see for example at which price a serious buy offer stands. The format here is ok as well, but maybe an option could be added, that if you want, you can open a screen where all active buy and sell orders are displayed? I know you guys have this open so to say behind the scenes, so it shouldn't be so hard to make it public either.

in topic People toying with the buy and sell orders display screen by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:21:09 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2885/21036 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2873
Thanks,

Scott Nestler

in topic Why I have less money? by Scott Nestler ]]> Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:43:30 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2873/20989 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2873
in topic Why I have less money? by Monti Burt ]]> Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:21:00 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2873/20988 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2869
in topic ATM bug by naohito Ruby ]]> Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:30:32 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2869/20969 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2869
Thank you,

Scott Nestler

in topic ATM bug by Scott Nestler ]]> Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:33:18 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2869/20967 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2869 my name is naohito Ruby.

On March 10 of the Japan time, I drew out 10,062L $ from ATM. →[9:08] JT Financial ATM 7.1.5 - CapEx: 10,062 Your withdrawal of has completed. Your new balance is 8,200.67. Thank you!

But..... I let you spread ・ ・, and the money is not transferred to my avatar. Please confirm it as soon as possible. Thanking you in advance.

and.....today....I cant used ATM. But, about 2000L＄
was not transferred to my avatar.

in topic ATM bug by naohito Ruby ]]> Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:46:03 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2869/20962 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2821
As i can see, this data is already internally available. For example the graph at the mainpage shows each stocks volulme in L$ rather than shares. However data shown in stock history (both on-site) and the downloadable CSV lacks this data. Because of this we're forced to guess.

My suggestion is, simply put: Add a column @ the stock history page called "Volume L$", this way people can view the actual trade record (essential when either calculating their recent value, or when estimating future value).

I would appreciate and hope this can be implemented relatively shortly.

in topic (more data) Total L$ amount traded by Andy Grant ]]> Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:13:07 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2821/20693 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2800 I am pleased with the volume traded of the day on November 28, confirming that slcapex is still attractive to investors sl.
all my wishes of encouragement to those who offer their time platform
Heck, my English did not always better!
kikok

in topic for more information by kikokenpyr Beaumont ]]> Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:22:04 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2800/20551 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2800
Thanks,

Scott

in topic for more information by Scott Nestler ]]> Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:00:10 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2800/20545 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2800 it would be possible to add the function: "volume history" of all companies on the platform slcapex?
thank you to consider my request.
amicably
kikok

in topic for more information by kikokenpyr Beaumont ]]> Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:29:27 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2800/20543 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523
in topic Rules? Where are they? by Cash Yiyuan ]]> Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:16:32 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523/20362 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523
in topic Rules? Where are they? by SynCere Talon ]]> Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:55:54 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523/20356 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523
Pep

in topic Rules? Where are they? by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:17:04 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523/20331 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523
All other links re-direct to where they should.

in topic Rules? Where are they? by Bogart Beck ]]> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:33:16 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523/20327 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523
Pep

in topic Rules? Where are they? by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:11:47 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523/20325 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769 yes it seems a good initiative. more companies, more trading volume, more activity short, more interesting or more fun. all manners slcapex needed changes so that the platform is more atacting . greetings

in topic Check out this idea forming in ISE by kikokenpyr Beaumont ]]> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:14:13 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769/20324 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769
in topic Check out this idea forming in ISE by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:01:40 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769/20323 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769
Basic RL example in Portland is the Antiques District. There are upwards of 10 antiques dealers in a fairly small neighborhood, but because they are all in vicinity it attracts large amounts of people wanting to see large amounts of antiques in a small amount of time. All of the dealers have slightly different product offerings and price points, so they are never directly competiting but improving the overall availability of that kind of good in the area.

That's my thoughts on it Alain. :)

Pep

in topic Check out this idea forming in ISE by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:34:09 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769/20314 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769
http://www.intlstockexchange.com/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=11043#p11043

in topic Check out this idea forming in ISE by Alain Delpiaz ]]> Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:58:46 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2769/20313 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606
Date 2nd Aug, 2009
-------------------------
I have been told that the problem is that I have cookies set off.

Maybe this is so ... I don't really know.

However, I access and trade stocks in the two other SL stock exchanges without a problem. So, why should it be a problem for this " stock exchange " ?

Also, the " ATM instructions note card " does not say anything about cookies.



in topic ATM Instructions Need Updates by Ernyd Wozniak ]]> Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:31:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606/19962 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2711
Pep

in topic Charting and Volume Numbers Not The Same... by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:21:56 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2711/19898 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2710
Pep

in topic Continued Listing Policies by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:59:06 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2710/19894 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2663
Pep

in topic Are you kidding? by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Sun, 31 May 2009 21:45:47 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2663/19542 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2663
BAY - Brittany Bay Resorts(Chairman of the Board:
Bogart Beck, Founder)

BIG - Beck Investment Group Public Forum{Chairman and Chief Exectutive Officer:
Bogart Beck, Founder
}

BTX - Beck Technical Research II(Chairman and Chief Exectutive Officer:
Bogart Beck, Founder


CAPX -SL Capital Exchange(Chairman of the Board:
Scott Nestler, Founder NIC

Chief Executive Officer:
Bogart Beck, Founder BIG

How is this person allowed to have access to there account,stocks and lindens. Bogart is all over the forums about this and that. If he would spend have the time working on what he should be like not having 4 companies stopped in trading.

CEO most likely to run next my vote is this person. Please prove me wrong. PLEASE make this post look stupid. By undoing what is happening in this market. Do the thing you position in your companies requires you to do. PLEASE !!! Scott if you read this. You seem so passionate about this market you have built. Why are you allowing this to go on? Do worry about what the other exchanges are doing. Make your better then them. You will see the return in the long run. Sorry just tired of seeing the train coming down the tracks. and no one has untied the investors before they get crushed.
You have a great tool going here use the dam thing right.


in topic Are you kidding? by Niccolo Brentley ]]> Sun, 31 May 2009 06:24:20 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2663/19539 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
Even with authorized and verified accounts. Which is why LL if they catch someone sharing an account or selling an account will just delete that account.

They have turned a blind eye in some instances (corporations) but for the majority it is not a wise move.

in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by SynCere Talon ]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 16:05:25 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19371 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
-Scott

in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 14:54:37 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19369 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
OK I couldn't resist a suitable and well thought out affiliate program.





in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 12:46:30 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19367 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 11:20:57 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19366 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
I tend to agree, would you consider allowing this facility for those with payment info on file?

However I would prefer to see many other improvements before this.

CB



in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 11:18:38 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19365 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
One of the issues that arrises when discussing Alts and linkage is that verification of the ownership is impossible.

As we are all aware we are not Linden Labs and CapEx does not have access to account information and for the safety and security of all of our financial interests here it would be better to play it safe on this subject and not link them together.

Anyone disagree?

Thanks,

Scott

in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 06:54:20 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19364 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
The short answer is accounts cannot be linked by SLCapex.

in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Cash Yiyuan ]]> Tue, 05 May 2009 22:57:59 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19360 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596 http://www.slcapex.com/pages/subaccounts

Found this. Hope it helps.

in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by SynCere Talon ]]> Tue, 05 May 2009 22:21:19 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19355 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606
Pep

in topic ATM Instructions Need Updates by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:27:14 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606/19156 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606
Thank You,

Scott

in topic ATM Instructions Need Updates by Scott Nestler ]]> Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:59:34 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606/19155 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606
Pep

in topic ATM Instructions Need Updates by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:16:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2606/19154 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2604
I would argue that slcapex can't afford not to invest into it ;)

As far as brokerage, it is indeed interesting but why not do it without the exchanges involvement ? Just setup your own ATM, and pay not-guaranteed indirect dividends if you make a profit on your stock trading. (except if Nicholas is your customer then you just tell him, oh we failed, and then relist his investment at WSE he'll sure understand while everybody else would receive it without ginko BS :P)

Nicholas, if you're reading this, and i'm sure you are, "the james theory" makes by far more sense than your "credit conspiracy theories".

in topic Invest into better charting by Andy Grant ]]> Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:45:08 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2604/19147 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2604
Cayman's idea about brokerages is very interesting to me, and tho it'd take a fair amount of setup, may be worth the time and money involved. The devil is in the details of course, and that's what I'd like to learn about before implementing such a program.

Pep

in topic Invest into better charting by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:30:18 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2604/19145 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2604
http://www.advsofteng.com/gallery_finance.html

in topic Invest into better charting by Andy Grant ]]> Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:54:10 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2604/19111 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596
Now I know that one can make Sub Accounts other than one's Main account on the website, but how difficult would it be to set it up in such a way that one could make a Sub Account for a different SL name so they could (after verification) both add and/or remove funds from said sub account as they please?

This would keep the portfolio relatively centered around the main account with the sub accounts 'governed' through in-game interactions by the sub accounts when needed.

Has this been explored/brought up before, then I'm very sorry to bring it up again, but it seems like something that could be useful to many. Including myself.

in topic (sub)accounts linkage? by Maki Guyot ]]> Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:05:00 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2596/19047 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2524 Thanks for the thoughts Gordon. I'll talk w/ Chango and see how diffficult that might be... sounds easy enough but what do I know...

Bo

in topic Suggestion for the Caplinx Sidebar by Bogart Beck ]]> Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:58:52 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2524/18492 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2524
On the web link the color for companies with no web link should be changed from red to black since red instantly makes people think of a negative connotation like halted. I don't see how changing this would be negative at all considering that blue links would still be readily distinguishable.

in topic Suggestion for the Caplinx Sidebar by Gordon Wendt ]]> Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:38:11 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2524/18491 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523
What gives?

in topic Rules? Where are they? by SynCere Talon ]]> Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:39:06 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2523/18483 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2460
Thanks for the response and I like what I read.

I'll be patient for these announcements, however maybe the Affiliate / Broker program should be tied into (3). Should they introduce a worthy IPO then they receive a reasonable commission. Another way of using others to to work on your behalf.

I've noticed a lack of forum contributions over the last couple of months, anyone else out there with a wish list?

Regards,

Cayman



in topic Three wishes for the New Year by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Sat, 27 Dec 2008 01:41:32 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2460/17967 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2460
Yeah, taking us a bit longer than we'd hoped to get SL CapEx back on firm footing - I think we're getting there slowly but surely. Regarding your wish list; here's a quick status (more to follow within the next week or two).

(1) Affiliate-Broker Program to be RELAUNCHED "Sooooon". Chango and Cash have been working on some programmatic and Administrative requirements since before Thanksgiving... I'm hoping we'll be ready for LAUNCH by late January if not sooner.

(2) Advertising; while we agree that getting NEW Investors on board is IMPORTANT we need to get the POLICY and CORP STRUCTURAL stuff done FIRST so that those that DO COME will STAY... an update on THAT STUFF is coming in the next week.

(3) IPO's, etc.; Some of that speaks to the Policy stuff I've been working on for MONTHS. I hope that you've noticed that almost all of our recent IPO's have indeed been PRODUCT-based companies (versus Estate Managers or Investment Co's). While we agree that ALL THREE business categories are necessary for a balanced market honestly we can only underwrite what's presented (and we're still rejecting 8 out of 10).

Bo

in topic Three wishes for the New Year by Bogart Beck ]]> Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:58:01 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2460/17960 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2460
I hope they will participate and offer their realistic appraisal of the suggestions.

I'll start the ball rolling:

1. Introduce a Broker system, incentives should be made for "serious traders" to make some extra L$ through a Broker system. It would be in these Brokers interests to attract new investors, which would benefit all. They will no doubt act as market makers for some of the companies, this being an attractive proposition for Capex who currently encourage CEO's to fill this void with company funds. This suggestion was mooted many many months ago but for some reason the debate fell silent.

2. See consistent Capex marketing/advertising to attract new investors. This seems to have been absent for the whole of 2008, maybe because of Arb's embarrassment with the SLW fiasco. This marketing can be in a variety of forms but doesn't need to be that expensive, just management with ideas.

3. Introduction of companies to IPO who already have a SL business presence and to banish for ever IPO start ups, why should our funds be used as an experiment. Llet the CEO prove a concept apply elsewhere for VC if required and then apply for an IPO when they have delivered and require expansion.

Regards,

Cayman

PS I was also going to say a multilingual platform, but that might have been a little biased. All have a wonderful 2009!


in topic Three wishes for the New Year by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Fri, 26 Dec 2008 13:28:09 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2460/17958 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2411
I really appreciate that there are quick responses to questions here on the exchange!

To be perfectly honest, I was kinda in a surly mood, so feel free to ignore my comment ;)

Thanks again!

Peperi Franizzi

in topic Happy Thanksgiving Is News?!?! by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:02:12 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2411/17541 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2411 Yo Peperi

Some of us appreciate a kind word for the holidays.

And, yes, generally the "News" you'll find here is of a PRESS RELEASE nature - that which is purposed to promote a company and its stock.

Cheers!

Bo

in topic Happy Thanksgiving Is News?!?! by Bogart Beck ]]> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:47:53 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2411/17513 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2411
Personally it seems as if the news board is used by CEO's to inflate daily volume in their stocks...but that's just my opinion...I'd like to hear yours.

in topic Happy Thanksgiving Is News?!?! by Peperi Franizzi ]]> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:21:53 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2411/17512 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2302 lol....:)

Mystic

in topic FAQ link off of the Info tab ..... by Mystic Handrick ]]> Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:54:33 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2302/16720 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2301 Cay,

Yes a makeover is in the works - hopefully a lil more than lipstick on the same ol' pig ;-). No definitive dates for the cosmetic stuff - our primary concern is some of the backend, Administrative and technical challenges to make the system more reliable and robust.

B



in topic A question for the new owners by Bogart Beck ]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:36:57 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2301/16715 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2301
Are you going to update the website? I'm not talking a costly upgrade just a sensible makeover. These requirements are well documented within this thread. Examples are:

Frequently Asked Questions - How can you afford to pay such high interest? ...

Affiliate Program - Host a JT Financial ATM and earn .01% Daily off of new accounts that sign up using that ATM ...

As you know I could go on, this does look unprofessional. Is it going to be addressed?

Regards,

Cayman
Verballis Translation Services - Words Across Worlds
http://verballis-translation-services.blogspot.com/

in topic A question for the new owners by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:33:57 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2301/16713 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283

in topic Info Page Error by Giampaolo Huldschinsky ]]> Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:58:59 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283/16647 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283
iV

in topic Info Page Error by iVentures Volitant ]]> Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:43:54 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283/16586 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283 We're aware of it iV and Chan is working on it. You might note that the Prospectus pages are also missing at the moment.

in topic Info Page Error by Bogart Beck ]]> Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:46:02 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283/16585 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283
iV

in topic Info Page Error by iVentures Volitant ]]> Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:53:41 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2283/16583 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2244
in topic For forum threads start at 0 instead of 1 by Gordon Wendt ]]> Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:31:43 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2244/16344 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2243
in topic Shared owned on IPO stocks by Gordon Wendt ]]> Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:29:24 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2243/16343 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2100
Bumped..... looks like your post was ignored. I fully agree that this should be addressed.

CB



in topic Any chance that you will be updating information available ont he by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:45:40 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2100/16049 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2211
That would be a wish from me to have the list sorted in perhpas the same way as the subaccounts are sorted when I go to my portfolio. There they are easy to find.





in topic sort list of subaccounts by Bims Writer ]]> Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:16:41 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2211/15956 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2208
in topic Log volume for activity chart? by SciFi Voom ]]> Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:43:12 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2208/15932 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2199
It must be noted that SL CapEx will allow you to download the complete price history and it should be trivial to make your own graphs.

However, I concur that having readily available graphs for long term periods would be a nice addition.

Samantha Goldflake
VSTEX Communication and Public Relations Director
http://www.vstex.net

in topic Company Charts by Samantha Goldflake ]]> Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:41:55 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2199/15819 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2199


in topic Company Charts by Ivan Halfpint ]]> Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:07:10 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2199/15817 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
At this point, I have to say that I do agree with you. Despite some chest thumping from one of the 4 SL exchanges around (and I'm excluding the WSE, since it's no longer a "pure" SL exchange) the situation has dramatically changed since the last year.

Less and less shareholders getting involved into the many things springing up. Meetings going more and more deserted.

Earlier today I performed some Google searches as I routinely do and I found out that some articles dealing with SL finances are no longer available because the source website does not exist anymore. This is true for both Italian and English speaking sources.

And if you look at the news sources still around, the coverage they give to SL finances has dwindled down. I could mention a few things which got no attention at all. And I think they deserved it.

There is the hype (sort of) about the WSE, "don't go there". There are some talks about exchanges cooperating. Facts, just a few. Almost none. We started something with SL CapEx, but it's not enough. We can't get a good grip on ISE in order to do something similar. ACE? There is an ocean between us and we're not comfortable at all with some of their recent actions.

We shall see...

Samantha Goldflake

VSTEX Communication and Public Relations Director
http://www.vstex.net

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Samantha Goldflake ]]> Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:51:57 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15785 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
Looking at companies, you see willing acceptance of big promises that hardly seem feasible. When it all hits the fan, you see five or six people jumping into rant, flame, post clever insults, and generally derail any serious inquiries or resolutions. I've always felt that exchanges were promising virtual platforms. And I think given the right crowd they might be - one day.

As a writer, I've had people come to me asking me to investigate an issue that anyone could research. It basically comes down to people wanting me to do their research for them. I've been asking myself if the virtual exchanges are appealing to people who want to make unrealistic amounts of money by investing in infeasible promises because they simply can't be bothered to formulate a plan to make their money work for them in a more conventional manner. Exchanges are a great platform for learning. And MAYBE making a couple of dollars. But the risks are great.

Overall, I'm inclined to think that the first step is shareholders taking their "gaming" seriously. Not sure if people have acquiesced or it was always thus. But it's not the kind of behavior I like to be associated with.


Bearing that, I can only say: Cross your fingers, Sam. People may surprise us yet ;)

km

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Konner McDonnell ]]> Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:23:36 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15502 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2159
And maybe a "note" by e-mail when Limit buys/Sells are executed?

I know it will certainly not be easy ... But still this was my 1L$ thoughts.

Kind regards



in topic Visual Alert when Company is halted. by Fellatione Aabye ]]> Fri, 08 Aug 2008 03:37:13 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2159/15463 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
"To what extent should exchanges be working with shareholders to pursue remedies beyond delistment/liquidation? If any."

Let's see what happened at the VSTEX over the last year.

We started our public operations on August 7, 2007. On August 26 we got a whopping amount of 6 companies as a result of a transfer from the competition:

AVC - Atlas Venture Capital
CGI - Countless Galaxies
BHE - Bart Heart Estates
VHI - Valentine Heart Inc.
KFM - Kristatos Fashion Mall
SLC - SL Creations (a merge of MDS - BOB - SLZ)

See: http://www.vstex.net/?p=103&id=2

AVC, CGI and KFM did not last long, since on September 14, 2007 a temporary halt was issued.

The options? There were no assets under our control, except for a few dimes here and there. A delistment was due, those companies could no longer keep trading with Jasper Tizzy and Teanna Nomura gone with the assets.

Liquidation was not an option, since assets were gone. At that time, we felt like the best option was to try and look around for people willing to take over those "public shells".

Basically the deal was "You take a company with no assets, you get to be listed on our exchange". In our eyes. that was a sensible move. Before we got to realize that we had opened a "canning" of monkeys... er... worms, we used that method again.

Time passed and we had to deal with CEOs disappearing from the scene, leaving behind them some assets. Not much, but something at least.

So, we still kept searching for someone to take over, but we imposed a forceful buyback on the new CEO, at a value equal to the liquidation value, or at least fair enough for shareholders wanting out (SLC, QCL).

This method will still be used for BNF, due to prior contacts and agreements, but we came to the conclusion that it may be not the best option, in the long run.

That's why DMG and DFC have gone through forceful liquidation after being delisted and that's why we changed our rules introducing the concept of "public shells". Now, for every delisted company we'll split any asset under our control to legitimate shareholders.

Could we do better than this? Sure. We'll try to reach agreements with SL CAPEX and ISE, in order to have assets of delisted VSTEX issuers seized, for later distribution to legitimate shareholders.

Beyond that, I fail to see what else we could do, but I'm open to suggestions.

Samantha Goldflake
VSTEX Communication and Public Relations Director
http://www.vstex.net

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Samantha Goldflake ]]> Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:52:30 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15322 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
Now we're really offtopic! :)

At the beginning of this thread, Bogart Beck stated:

"Feel free to moderate as you feel moved - I'll jump in when/if I feel compelled to take a position"

In keeping with that, Konner McDonnell previously wrote:

"Since this door was opened[by Samantha Goldflake], I think it's necessary for us to take a step back and look at the bigger picture before we start narrowing that focus."

So, we're not offtopic. We are right where we should be. Anything involving the limitations of allowing a CEO to do anything -or- limitations imposed upon those CEOs will always return to "how much can we conceivably do to enforce those limitations?"

The various rules and underwriting processes may serve to keep the riff-raff from opening shop on the three exchanges you mentioned. Once you turn them down, they'll simply go to Ancapex. The WSE is open now. And Luke has an SPO for the WSE (since the WSE is owned by HCL, how this is even possible, I don't know. There certainly wasn't a first public offering) and I suspect once he's squeezed every dime he can out of his "SPO" then he'll start letting other companies trade there. Both follow the logic of "Anyone can list, so long as I gets mine." Ancapex may be liberal, but I highly doubt they'd consort with the WSE. Nor would any of the other three. So a true council won't happen. Not that it'd be fix.

Let me put this crudely. Any company that gets past your underwriting processes has to 'woo' investors. Once they've successfully courted those investors, they're in the position to slip off in the night while those investors are still sleeping without so much as a "Dear John Letter." There's a few CEOs that aren't going to necessarily run away, but are simply lazy, inept, or apathetic towards the needs of their shareholders.

Now the exchanges would probably say: "shareholders need to riot." Such as with MNM. But the most cogent of arguments and persuasive of speeches are in no more a position to compel executive response than an all-out rant. Companies are listed at the pleasure of the exchanges. Shareholders are attended to at the pleasure of the CEOs.

Leaving the RL legal arguments aside, my question is simply: To what extent should exchanges be working with shareholders to pursue remedies beyond delistment/liquidation? If any. I think that's the question that must be answered before shareholders can even consider "how far is too far" in the privatization matter and all other matters relating to the current shareholder-CEO relationship.

Edit: I wanted to mention that there's a few questions I've previously asked that weren't addressed. I'll return to this later. Right now it's most important to consider the exchange/investor relationship.

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Konner McDonnell ]]> Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:51:04 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15291 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
First off (and I'm not saying it to put down the others) the VSTEX has the most extensive set of rules covering different topics and areas.

Second, we are in very good terms with SL CAPEX and ISE. We speak with Borgart Beck on an almost regular basis. With Cocky Dagger we have very rare contacts, but we do respect him and the ISE, as he respects us.

ISE seem set on a "let the market forces work it out" policy and from their forum I got the impression that the general consensus there is not to have more rules than the current ones and keep on following the current path.

Before commenting on the council you're talking about Scott, I would like to hear from SL CAPEX. Anyway, I have doubts that such a council could ever get LL to change anything in the assets area.

Samantha Goldflake
VSTEX Communication and Public Relations Director
http://www.vstex.net

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Samantha Goldflake ]]> Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:53:37 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15271 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
All of the exchanges should get together, regardless of ego's or politics involved and form a council.

Policies and Rules should be set that all exchanges follow, exchanges would be free to have additional rules and policies as they see fit.

This would eliminate the company owners who move from exchange to exchange and also offer a level of protection to shareholders who do not trade on multiple exchanges.

Once the policies and rules are in place the council of exchanges could do to Linden Labs and one voice and ask for assistance in expanding the policies and rules into the Linden Labs arena of enforceability.

Also, this would end the speculation of Linden Labs banning the exchanges and giving Linden Labs the ability to communicate freely to that organized council.

Once this is all done the Council can petition Linden Labs to create the ability for Sims, Land and other assets to be owned by a company and not just a single avatar.

This ability would help prevent or hamper CEO's from "cashing" out of SL easily and leaving shareholders out to dry.

Any thought?

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Scott Nestler ]]> Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:00:04 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15268 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
We are aware that a CEO could just say "to the hell with your rules, I go private/delist/whatever", so why the many rules the VSTEX has, why we talk about "shareholders rights", "fiduciary duties" and so on?

We try to educate CEOs and management of every VSTEX issuer. We really try. A year ago it was very easy to get and keep a listing with us, now it's much harder, but that's not the point. Ethics, disclosure, sound corporate governance, are common and often used terms for us.

With some CEOs we did not have much success, but there's always hope for the future.

Samantha Goldflake
VSTEX Communication and Public Relations Director
http://www.vstex.net

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Samantha Goldflake ]]> Sat, 02 Aug 2008 17:25:23 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15260 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Ironfist Hutchinson ]]> Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:44:11 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15246 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
The SL Capital Exchange is a FICTITIOUS STOCK MARKET SIMULATION operating SOLELY as an Element to an online GAME. It is NOT a REAL WORLD SECURITIES ENTITY and does NOT offer ANY opportunity for REAL WORLD PROFITS or INVESTMENT. Please be forewarned, we make NO REPRESENTATION OF ANY KIND REGARDING THE ACCURACY, FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR USE
OF THE SOFTWARE CONSTITUTING THE EXCHANGE WHATSOEVER. PLEASE PLAY ACCORDINGLY!



in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Ironfist Hutchinson ]]> Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:35:56 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15245 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
While the induvidual exchanges were playing their powergames with eachother about being marketleader and ignoring the cries for better regulation and transparancy
they failed to protect their investors from being ripped off again and again.

This all has been a classic example of an unregulated freemarket mechanism doing its job. The term FREEMARKET MECHACHANISM does not mean free from rules or bounderies.

The little bit of rules upto now are only there to protect the exchanges from being held responsible for failures on their behalf.

The first thing that needs to be changed is making the INVESTOR the most important factor in this game and all rules should be directed towards her/his safety and benefit, because neither the exchanges nor would any company listed or willing to list exsist without them.

DUE DILLIGENCE from the exchanges on integrity and viabillity of companies that want to be listed on their platform should be much tighter, and accept responsibillity for those who slip through their Standards set and not leave the investor bleeding for their failure on DUE DILLIGENCE.

Due dilligence from the investor is about finding out if the company is going to be profitable enough to risk investing in, and NOT about if it is to be trusted with my money. Maybe it is naive but I rely on the exchanges to select those companies who are integer, otherwise I could just as well invest privately and run the same risk without expenses on tradefees.

I can live with loosing money on stupid investment choises I make myself or not beeing savy enough to make my money work for me, but loosing money on being ripped off due to poor security measures and even worse regulation makes my blood boil, specially when they then say, it is not our job to prevent criminals from stealing your money or persue them when they do so on our exchange.

hundredthousands,if not several millions of RL dollars invested through L$ have vanished in the last years. All claimed to be invested in RL oportunities or RL companies. The fact that LL slammed down the hammer on in world scemes does not mean that the RL investments stop exsisting too now does it.

A good rule to have would be the obligation to report on the prospectus if the company has intentions to invest the IPO money soley in SL or has plans to utilise it in RL. which btw leads me to the next point, are the exchanges soley a SL investment game and meant to be played in world or are they also platforms to raise funds for RL plans ? Should SL IPO money not be restricted to the SL economy only ?

If you have RL business plans go to a bank or at least raise your venture capital in RL.

Yes I am a bit of a SL fundamentalist on this one,

keep the GAME within the borders of the SL GAMEBOARD.

Hutch

in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Ironfist Hutchinson ]]> Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:53:59 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15244 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111
"Yet, a CEO can just delist his company, or run away. What the CEO wants, he will get it either way.

The VSTEX now has specific rules about "Public shells, reverse mergers, mergers, acquisitions" (Section E of our listing rules). If you read that section, you will see a "4. RESERVED"; that's going to be used for privatizations and everything in our "Section E" will go hand in hand with Section D. "Shareholders meetings and exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies".

We try to provide a solid foundation, meant to give both CEOs/company managers and shareholders an idea about how things should be."

In my previous writings, I've called attention to the CEOs absolute power. In writing this inquiry, I took what you've mentioned syllogistically. But since you opened the door, I think a discussion on the topic of privatization -or any other issue that wholly depends on the CEO's willingess to comply- is predicated by undeniable fact of absolute power.

So let's start there.

The exchanges have varying rules. But aren't the exchange's rules merely self-protective? While we all willingly admit to the fact that CEOs do have absolute power, does the implementation of 'rules' and the establishment of 'committees' such as the SLEC only really serve to provide the illusion of legitimacy when neither can regulate the companies themselves? Further, while we accept this absolute power, we also use terms like 'fiduciary relationship" between CEOs and shareholders. Finally and I suppose most importantly, are the exchanges not the gateway by which CEOs obtain their absolute power? To what extent should the exchanges burden themselves with seeking enforceable remedies to ensure the aforementioned 'fiduciary relationship' is honored?

Since this door was opened, I think it's necessary for us to take a step back and look at the bigger picture before we start narrowing that focus. But let's not lose sight of the broader picture. The implications apply to all exchanges, regardless of their countries of origin, disposition of their administrators, or any other factors that might separate any single exchange from its contemporaries.


in topic Privatization of Public Companies by Konner McDonnell ]]> Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:53:54 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/suggest/2111/15211