http://slcapex.com/forums/browse/LNL en-us Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:33:18 -0800 Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:33:18 -0800 http://slcapex.com/forums/ Kudang SQL2RSS admin@slcapex.com webmaster@slcapex.com 60 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989 Whatever Lindsay. Apparently you have a different version of reality than the rest of us.

Bo

in topic L&L Financial Services (LNL) Delisted for Material Non-Complianc by Bogart Beck ]]> Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:33:58 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989/14186 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989
in topic L&L Financial Services (LNL) Delisted for Material Non-Complianc by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:07:55 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989/14182 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989 CORRECTION: Chairman asked for a HALT ostensibly under the premise that they were to reorganize in a manner that was preferential to shareholders - and then failed to do so.

Company delisted for material Non-Compliance - to wit, failure to submit conforming Financial Statements for two consecutive months.

Bo Beck


in topic L&L Financial Services (LNL) Delisted for Material Non-Complianc by Bogart Beck ]]> Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:00:59 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989/14179 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989
in topic L&L Financial Services (LNL) Delisted for Material Non-Complianc by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:38:03 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989/14171 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1999
http://www.slcapex.com/forums/topic/general/1996

http://llcorporationinc.forumotion.com/sl-capex-delistment-f14/shareholder-meetings-t9.htm#17

in topic LLFS Updates by Scott Nestler ]]> Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:34:48 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1999/14170 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1994 The LNL and LCA Forums maintained on SL CapEx will remain in force until at least the end-of-month (June 2008) to allow those who may be away on holiday or otherwise indisposed ample time to peruse and archive whatever content they feel is appropriate to secure their shareholder claim.

Bo Beck

in topic L&L Corporation Forums by Bogart Beck ]]> Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:38:46 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1994/14146 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1994 http://llcorporationinc.forumotion.com for further discussion of the L&L Brand. The website is under construction so I have pulled the forums out of it for access meantime. Thanks!

At this time, I request that SL CapEx discontinue the forums.

in topic L&L Corporation Forums by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:03:38 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1994/14142 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989 L&L Financial Services (LNL) Delisted for Material Non-Compliance - 06/12/2008

L&L Financial Services (LNL) has been DELISTED from the SL Capital Exchange effective 12:01AM June 12,2008. The LNL Forums will remain active through end-of-month to allow interested parties to communicate and/or archive information relative to LNL's history.

Persons seeking information regarding LNL are directed to contact Lindsay Druart.

A Final LNL Shareholders Report has been distributed to Lindsay Druart and is reproduced here for convenience.

Name LNL
Cayman Beaumont 1213579
Lindsay Druart 1211572
LNLBT Miles 690865
Servme Nakamura 488000
Luke Birdbrain 446385
Scott Nestler 305008
OttoVan Oyen 300000
Difrajealb Chevalier 299060
Kubi Beam 173507
Anastasia Gazov 170001
Tranquilo Holgado 115033
Devilin Eusebio 50000
Michail Anatine 50000
Morphine Whiteberry 47045
Anre Heron 45680
shii Jacobus 32713
Sully Okelly 30934
Maisha Slade 25293
Sando Haller 24880
toya Miklos 24153
Yanka Slade 23500
Antonella Sirbu 18426
Ze Novikov 16185
scheherazade Howley 14317
Francisco Robledo 14000
Tumult Ivanova 11910
Ragged Delec 10010
Analog Planer 10000
Mateo Infinity 10000
Phil Applemoor 7182
Kahai Kubo 6373
Dillian Novi 6164
Beeboo Doobie 5900
Leesil Carfagno 5338
Andreas Mill 5000
broker Ferraris 5000
Bims Writer 4700
Jurin Juran 4650
Analyssa Minnelli 4275
unbonbom Aabye 4034
Germano Rossini 4000
Spleen Oh 4000
Lei Kish 3822
selesteMXX Maxsted 3496
Pipes Pessoa 3000
Tizznabus Lykin 3000
Marcellino Maddaloni 2817
AWRestonez Vella 2500
Paci Barbarossa 2500
Xenin Rau 2230
Kammie Catteneo 2208
Dale Hefferman 2000
Dol Allen 2000
lupidu Vestel 2000
Maxmillian Auer 2000
Qetef Oyen 2000
SEXYMAMI69 Tripsa 2000
Slforum Huet 1481
Michelle Medby 1334
Philippe Daniels 1277
HansJuergen Rau 1142
Kim Shelford 1000
LowerSaxon Jaxxon 1000
MrNickolas Lytton 1000
Nadia Matova 1000
Peteh Gabe 1000
Valence Beaumont 1000
DIMM Flow 900
Tom Prospero 800
fahri Allen 700
Uli Zabelin 635
Zonek Wopat 600
home Hyun 552
Turano Lane 546
DrolKrad McKinney 535
Conico Csak 526
Mikael Book 500
Bubba Herzog 472
Kenshi Dagger 400
Chaarlton Heston 271
Poco Roffo 268
Alesandro Loon 250
Crissty Heartsdale 250
Catleen Carter 200
Dega Shu 200
Jeffery Bergbahn 200
Leo Short 200
lobisones Congrejo 200
Myron Cerveau 200
Thrasher Bing 200
Willie Independent 200
Kyleus Witte 169
BobbyE Runo 147
Sly Saunders 141
Kdmutual Planer 135
Aurelia Melnik 107
Cornelious Beck 100
dojydoj Dominquez 100
dtd Streeter 100
ferre Howlett 100
Layne Weston 100
Leah Vultee 100
Lorren Munro 100
Madog Garsztka 100
Nadia Korobase 100
NicoleA Stine 100
Spindale Worthington 100
Wishful Merlin 100
Ryder Capalini 93
Dr37923 Trautman 83
Dale Eel 70
real2real Aabye 70
Archie Tatham 65
Galenia Decosta 50
Jeb Gibb 50
Maelstrom Baphomet 50
red Dutton 50
Chamell Vhargon 30
Merval Forder 30
Rio Cruz 20
Rolpe Rodenberger 20
Sarine Alderson 20
Ara Takaaki 14
Spigot Spyker 11
John Rayna 10
Moyo Manamiko 10
sheila6225 Allen 10
Caleja Offcourse 8
ThaBiGGDoGG Richez 8
DennisE Oh 6
Guytano Dallagio 5
Horatio Revnik 5
Kella Aya 4
Lumpy Aeon 4
Giddy Phillip 2
mohan Korobase 2
Neil Roffo 2
pirilli Bonetto 2
Aeneas Whitfield 1
Amibank Carter 1
Dezmond Martinek 1
DFH Westland 1
Escortina Pfeffer 1
Io Habilis 1
jasonroberts Holmer 1
Kadena Whitfield 1
Sportsbets Writer 1
Stroh Bing 1
thx1138 Vanbeeck 1
waelya Tenk 1
Xenia Easterman 1


in topic L&L Financial Services (LNL) Delisted for Material Non-Complianc by Bogart Beck ]]> Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:35:52 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1989/14096 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1969
in topic Question about the liquidation from the Certificate of Deposit by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 05 Jun 2008 05:39:29 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1969/13964 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1969 Will you have any measures for liquidation about the Certificate of deposit?
Or can I withdraw the fund after the maturity of CD?
Thanks.

in topic Question about the liquidation from the Certificate of Deposit by PaynepainXT Greenwood ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:53:45 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1969/13958 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:24:17 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13953 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
With all this bickering going on between the major shareholders, the un-professional content of most posts, the anger, frustration...etc. It has come to the point where, justified or not, people have lost faith in any L&L related business.

So my question is this.

IF the new company can be registered with Capex, and the conversion done, does anyone really believe that the new company shares will be worth anything?

I'm with Scott. I have a sizable number of shares of the LNL Liquidation Fund. Those are not shares in a company per se, they are a promise to have my former Certificate Of Deposit repaid. I want that money..in full....not some worthless shares in a company that will, from the start, carry heavy baggage.



in topic MAJOR ISSUE by robcling Ah ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:52:45 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13951 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
seleste

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by selesteMXX Maxsted ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:35:30 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13949 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965
The reasing I had to have a meeting was to take everything out from behind close doors, and resolve it.

in topic Request to SL CapEx Management by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:37:39 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965/13947 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Servme Nakamura ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:06:39 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13946 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
As for being forced out, I stated that I was being driven out because Bogart stated that he would rather me delist and handle the issue else where. There was a bit of double talk in that email. One minute it was all support and the next it was go elsewhere to deal with it. The whole point in combining everything is to have a platform in which to provide a return on investment through dividends and eventually reduce shares down the line. Without a trading platform, it would make it unneccessary to combine and would actually be more fruitful to liquidate but that would cause way more losses than with a trading platform.

Sure I can list it on L&LFS but that is creating a bias and does not have near the traffic that would be needed for shareholders to take advantage of market flucuations that could potential be more fruitful than the original investment. I wasn't taking anything personal at all. As I stated to Scott, emotion has no place in any of this which was why I was giving him researched and documents numbers when it came to his suggested repayment plan that involved us paying him $110,000 a month during the SL summer slump.

Historical facts and projection in the land business in SL, especially with the recent dive in property value with the dive in avatars logged that happens every summer would suggest that most land companies will not make enough in tier and profit alone to cover tier in some cases so it tends to dip into working capital. We came across this issue last year but we staved it off from the $2.5 million surplus that we had at the time that allowed us to guarantee a $.10/share dividend from June until the end of the 4th quarter. The summer months are a proven and known slump in business grid wide. If we are struggling during those months just to make tier payments, how could we agree and afford $110,000 a month? We can't. And I expressed this to Scott as my concern because I would not agree to something that I know I could not make good on. I don't want to promise him that it would be done and I know good and damn well I could not. It's impossible.

Liquidating assets at the current stance of the market and the grid would prove to have greater losses than say if liquidation happened toward the end of fall or the winter when numbers in SL tend to quadruple grid wide. When we started the brand, 15,000 people on the grid would crash the place. Now, we are looking at 60,000 constantly but the daily average will taper off from now until September. That is statistically proven.

I hear what every one is saying and I am not denying that some ideas are good and some are not. ServMe has proven over almost 2 years to be the most sound mind and idealistic person I have encountered and I thank her for being the objective level head when everyone else is heated and fighting. I am trying to walk into this heavily researched not providing thoughts of granduer of what I can do. I am telling and showing what I CAN'T do and why. I am putting the risks right here in plain view and I am asking for discussion and understanding without the excess drama. I only posted what Bo said in email because Scott did and it really pissed me off because I have asked that emails remain confidential until resolutions are derived. I have asked this of Scott and Cayman many times and Cayman has usually obliged but Scott on the other hand has no respect for me and at this point, it is pretty mutual but that is personal and I am trying not to let it affect how I handle him with business.

I am not trying to defraud anyone or run off with anything. If that was the intention, I would have done it by now instead of sitting here ignoring my RL to plead with those interested for a resolution. I am with ServMe. I thought we were on a good path here but evidently smoke is being blown behind closed doors. Fine. SL CapEx wants me to handle the issue elsewhere. I will. Just waiting on the shareholder list.....

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 06:20:13 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13942 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
SLCAPEX management has a mandate now (I assume) to try and restore investor confidence and limit bad press. LnL has been a disaster they have to be cautious with dealing with a company with such a history of failures. I dont think Druart should be taking anything personally and getting all bent out of shape.

She is the one who raised money for LCA which never did anything - and quite frankly was a goofy idea (nothing wrong with that though lots of goofy ideas that actually work in SL.) LNL like other got nailed in the banking ban and is now presently worthless. Which leaves us with the rental and sales company. Why not liquidate all your assetss and start paying people back?

It clear your in over your head and cant deal with all this. Cut your losses and do what you can to repay people. Thats what I think would be best for everyone.

Just my 2c

Cheers

Ivan

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Ivan Halfpint ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:29:53 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13940 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
I never said that I wanted everyone else to get shares for there debt, I just stated that I was not going to accept them and that you have no right to force me to accept them.

After which you threatened to delete all of my shares.

My issues are your unilateral decision making and your refusal to make good.

The emails were between you and I, I did not post them nor did I forward them. When you emailed me that you were going to force me to accept shares for the debt is when I emailed CapEx refusing them.

Servme, I can understand your fustrations. I have the same ones.



in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Scott Nestler ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:22:37 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13939 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
I will stick with the original plan and complete the conversion as it was stated. As far as with CB, I asked for ideas and I didn't get any. Luke will not be in SL again for a long time and from day one we have agreed that if one left, possessions would default to the other as we have always had access to each others accounts and such. This had put a lot more pressure on my than before because I have NO backup right now which is why things are taking longer than I expected. But I hope to have this done soon.

I am waiting on SL CapEx to provide me with the LCA shareholder list.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:34:13 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13933 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965
If it's about people being able to express their opinion, they can do that here as well. I was seriously under the impression that the other thread was leading to a resolution, but apparently somewhere out of the forums once again something went wrong.

in topic Request to SL CapEx Management by Servme Nakamura ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:50:53 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965/13932 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
The conversion rates were posted by Lindsay for review, Scott suggested some alterations to them based on 30 averages and I seem to recall that Lindsay was not opposed to take a look at those new conversion rates, and was plugging some numbers.

I took a look at the numbers Scott posted and expressed my support, with some other small issues still needing to be resolved, and suggestions made. I was under the impression that we were getting somewhere, albeit slowly.

Now private mails between parties emerge suggesting that the exchange can't support yet another conversion plan, as it would damage the perception and trust of SL financial markets and exchanges. Since the exchange calls the shots as to whom gets to play on their turf, fine.

To me however, it sounds as if some people with ulterior motives are trying to force their hand and get what they want, disregarding everyone else. If you think you fit that description, you're probably right.

I think I'll consider dumping all my SL stocks and go play in a sandbox for the next couple of years, SL finances and exchanges are a big joke. However, don't count me out. Every share I hold resembles a vote, and I plan to use them to support or shoot down proposals as I see fit.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Servme Nakamura ]]> Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:40:45 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13931 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
On a side note, the next thing SL Capex should develope is a voting system. This way it would be much easier to reach, and hear the voices of the investors.

There are only a select few people REALLY involved here, no need for everyone to hear everything.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Legolas Delgado ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:39:44 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13926 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:22:04 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13924 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965
in topic Request to SL CapEx Management by Scott Nestler ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:34:28 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965/13922 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
Do you not see a problem when your major share holders have such an issue with your actions?

Your converstion numbers, that took 14 days to post, did I not bring up the issue on their accuracy within 20min of you posting them?

The arrogant attitude toward me is insulting and if you really want someone to blame, go look in the mirror.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Scott Nestler ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:30:28 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13920 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:11:02 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13919 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960 People can read Lindsay. It's pretty obvious EXACTLY what I was saying. FYI, Scott is not the only MAJOR shareholder crying foul with you... Cayman has made comments and offered suggestions, as has Ivan, Serveme and many others. Do you not have an obligation to confer with them?

For the Record I reposted your rambling BLOG as a courtesy - you are still obligated to formulate a plan of action, circulate it to your shareholders (of each entity involved), convene a vote of approval, and, if for some reason your proposal were not accepted by a majority, than ostensibly you would solicit, evaluate and compare any alternative options put forward by your shareholders. It is painfully obvious to me and anyone else here that pays attention that you've ...er... skipped a few steps.

I'll forward the LCA and LNL FINAL Shareholder Lists shortly.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Bogart Beck ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:02:52 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13918 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:48:03 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13916 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
And I only posted what was said because Scott had already done it. I will talk about something that happened but I RARELY post what is said in an email.

I still don't understand how you can say you didn't see anything when YOU WENT TO THE BLOG AND POSTED IT ON THE MAIN PAGE!

Scott did this to get people on his side because he and I are barking about the bonehead deal he made. I didn't sk to leave SL CapEX. I asked to be able to delist and regroup.

YOU came to me telling me that you had changed your outlook because of what people were telling you. You didn't asked me anything. You said in that email that you would ask that we delist and handle it elsewhere. Don't change what you said now. I never said anything was your fault but you were in the kitchen until it got hot and now you are throwing the rock and hiding your hands. Thanks Bo. Much obliged for your hospitality.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:46:26 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13914 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Arnaud Villota ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:22:28 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13910 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960 Let's be VERY clear here Lindsay. You and Scott have this ongoing habit of posting private email conversations into your Forums with the hope that they will generate support, sympathy or drama - it's been a modus operandi for you forever.

The email exchange between you, scott and myself - which Scott posted here for comment states NOWHERE that we have made a decision WHATSOEVER regarding the disposition of LCA/LNL. It simply clarified the Exchanges position and requirements for you to execute a plan or Re-Organization - NOTHING MORE. I further stated that the Exchange would have NO OFFICIAL Opinion until such plan was submitted, reviewed and commented upon.

The mere fact that you have FAILED to DISTRIBUTE such plan here, or sought shareholder approval in a formal capacity or done ANYTHING to ally the fears and concerns of your shareholders leads me to believe that you have NO INTENTION of honoring your commitments and obligations as an Executive of no less than (3) seperate companies that have accepted shareholder monies, ostensibly in good faith.

If indeed you'd have us DELIST your entities SO BE IT but DON'T YOU DARE LAY THE BLAME FOR YOUR COMPLETE AND TOTAL FAILURE AS AN EXECUTIVE AT THE FEET OF SL CAPEX. Your MESS is YOUR DOING AND YOURS ALONE.


in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Bogart Beck ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:17:44 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13909 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:57:57 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13907 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
Thanks.


in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Arnaud Villota ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:47:17 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13906 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965
I am assuming that locked assets will be kept by SL CapEx. I have no idea how that is done at this exchange. If they are being released, I would ask that the accounts be unlocked to retrieve assets for our portfolio. Once I have recieved the shareholder list for LCA, I ask that SL CapEx Management proceed with complete delistment. A group will be issued including all L&L Corporation shareholders for updates and soon the website and forums will be complete for information as well.

Lindsay Druart

in topic Request to SL CapEx Management by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:26:21 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1965/13905 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
The only thing left to be done is the conversion of the shares. That was it.

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 03 Jun 2008 16:24:52 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13904 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960
Scott,

Lindsay has not yet submitted a plan of Reorganization to SL CapEx for review. It is highly unlikely that we would allow or support a recapitalization plan that was not equitable for all parties to be listed on SL CapEx - far better for us to just ask Lindsay to delist her companies here and deal with whatever settlement or trading plan she might have going forward on her own exchange.

We get far too much bad press already due to Arb's unfortunate circumstances. More of the same attributable to a company which we don't control would not be an equitable arrangement.

At this point I can't really have an OFFICIAL position until Lindsay submits a plan for review (which from reading the forums today is likely going to be delayed until later this week). I know she's trying to come up with a fair plan - looks like she still has some ground to cover.

With regard to what you ultimately accept or reject, honestly, that's between you and Lindsay - we're just a trading house and can't tell her how to run her co (beyond our listing and compliance policies).

Food for thought.

Bo

in topic MAJOR ISSUE by Scott Nestler ]]> Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:18:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1960/13867 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Why are you rounding before the conversion is done instead of afterward?

Are you saying that, if I have 1000 LLLF shares , according to your rounding I will only be left with 500 shares of LLC? You say that you are honoring the original 1$/share value for LLLF, but your method of converting is only valuing LLLF at 1.78/2 or 0.89/share.

The way it should be done is as follows,

1000 shares of LLLF divided by 1.78 will result in 561.798 shares of LLC. NOW you round and end up with 562 shares of LLC.



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Givara Balnarring ]]> Mon, 02 Jun 2008 10:56:01 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13842 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:41:00 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13835 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943

http://lindsaydruart.blogspot.com

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:33:58 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13834 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
I've waited since March and it's already June. Why don't you act professionally and provide the investors the respect they deserve. It doesn't take months to receive atleast a partial payment does it?

iV

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by iVentures Volitant ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 17:02:50 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13783 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Rastin Tigerpaw ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 13:51:51 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13775 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 12:52:06 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13774 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
iV

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by iVentures Volitant ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 11:50:44 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13771 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Lindsay's accounts are already Suspended due to the mere fact that both entities are HALTED (one at Lindsay's request, the second for non-compliance).

I'll tell you up front that LNL has maintained MINIMAL balances on SL CapEx. Makes sense really - they were a BANK.



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Bogart Beck ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 11:18:22 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13770 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
iV

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by iVentures Volitant ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 11:07:40 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13769 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 09:22:34 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13767 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
>L&L Financial Services at $.35/share (30 day average) = 5/1 converstion to LLC
>L&L Financial Services outstanding at $1/share = 2/1 conversion to LLC

I appreciate if you clarify what you mean by "outstanding" above.

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by sheila6225 Allen ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 05:59:29 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13765 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1945
The forums here are filled with opinions about the L&L brand and companies, so asking a broad question like that may not get you much further.

How about asking specific questions instead, as we've all posted our point of view on specific issues that affect(ed) the L&L companies before.

Why don't you send out a short list of questions you'd like to see answered, I think some of us may be willing to take the time to read and answer them.

in topic Investors insights by Servme Nakamura ]]> Fri, 30 May 2008 02:09:52 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1945/13764 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1945
I am thinking about writing a story about everything occuring here with the L&L companies and am looking for your insights.

I would love for everyone with an opinion to post it here.

Thank you in advance,

Scout Haystack
SL Freelance Reporter

in topic Investors insights by Scout Haystack ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 19:09:37 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1945/13759 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Servme Nakamura ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 17:25:16 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13753 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Who told you about my deal???

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 16:45:15 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13751 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
And ServMe that is actually a good idea. I will plug that into the template. Erm...the retiring thing...not the Florida house thing...

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 15:25:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13749 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943 Yes, I've been given the option to cash out all my shares for L$1 and in return receive the ownership of a 3000sqm villa at the coast of Florida, in Real Life that is. I tried uptalking the deal to include a butler and maid service, but Lindsay said that another dictator supporting shareholder had already acquired those.

I don't know whether that would count as a side deal to you, but there you have it.
(sarcasm off)

I find your hinting rather inappropriate to be honest.

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Servme Nakamura ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 15:23:07 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13748 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Your edited post inferred that there were other choices, I assume you've deleted the post as you hadn't thought through the consequences of actually giving shareholders a choice. Is this belligerent enough?

Are there any side deals taking place allowing preferential treatment to shareholders that support your diktat.

CB


in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 15:13:31 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13745 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Just a suggestion.

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Servme Nakamura ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:59:34 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13744 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:53:03 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13743 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:51:26 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13742 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
I read your reply before it was edited. Please enlighten me with your other proposals?

CB

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:50:49 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13741 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
I could agree to the preliminary conversion table that scott suggests in this thread (made at 13:32), providing the depositors whom still had cash frozen in LLFS or LLCRA get a correct conversion rate as well.

Their deposit didn't lose value (L$1 still equals L$1) so they should get a conversion rate of 1.56 or whatever we're valuing LLC at now.

Unless someone cares to explain why my reasoning is incorrect :)

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Servme Nakamura ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:47:27 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13740 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:17:22 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13737 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943


in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 14:06:19 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13736 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 13:51:17 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13735 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Do you agree on the raw data?

Conversion looks like this right now.........

LLLF
2-1
4,000,000
2,000,000

LLL
1-1
2,813,000

LCA
3-1
5,000,000
1,666,667

LLFS
4-1
6,000,000
1,500,000

Total
Current-17,813,000
New Corp-7,979,667


in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 13:32:50 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13734 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 13:26:59 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13733 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
LLFS's website does not have the research option, like capex, working so I had to rely on the prospectus for the shares.

Liquidation Fund 4mil shares
Rental & Sales 2.813mil shares
LCA 5mil shares
LLFS 6mil shares
Total 17.813mil shares



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 12:18:38 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13725 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
The reason being LCA is worthless - infact is worth less then nothing - same with LNL. So all that is happening is LLL or whatever the new company is will just be massivly diluted.



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Ivan Halfpint ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 11:45:57 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13723 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 11:37:20 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13722 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 11:25:55 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13721 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 11:20:23 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13720 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 11:19:44 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13719 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
I was thinking of these shares

LNLCA Dawes 1,307,915 26.2%
Sully Okelly 577,628 11.6%
LNLBT Miles 225,583 4.5%

LNLBT Miles 690,865 11.5%

Will these be retired prior to the share conversion?

I'm not sure where you're going with your answer can you explain further?


in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 10:03:59 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13714 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 10:03:54 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13713 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:59:58 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13712 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:56:03 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13711 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
LNLF = 2/1
LLL = 1/1
LCA = 3/1
LNL = 4/1
LCA outstanding = 2/1
LNL outstanding = 2/1

LNLF is honored at the original $1/share proposed at opening. This has been the consensus with those shareholders. Rounding to the nearest whole number on the decimals.

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:48:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13710 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:39:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13708 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943 LCA 60 day average, from 3/5 thru 5/9 is .62

I have the raw data if you want it

-Scott

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:38:54 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13707 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:32:36 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13706 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
$1.78 was the last sell price at halt Scott. 60 days may be better but LLL was halted on May 19th I believe so 60 days prior.

Look, I could just throw you some numbers and say deal with it but I did post that this was preliminary and that is was to be discussed so if discussing it with the shareholders is ignoring you Cayman then I guess my definition of a discussion is clearly flawed. Now, we can do one of two things here. Discuss and come to an agreement or you can continue the whole hate mail thing that most of the forums has grown tired of in the recent weeks.

Personally, I am argued out. I know the problem. I am working on the solution.

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:28:48 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13705 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
30 Days 1.41
45 Days 1.47
60 Days 1.56
90 Days 1.69
120 Days 1.71


Price History
LLL: L&L Rentals and Sales
Date High Low Close Bid Ask Volume
5/29/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/28/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/27/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/26/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/25/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/24/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/23/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.78 0
5/22/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.78 0
5/21/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 0
5/20/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 0
5/19/2008 2:01 1.78 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 500
5/18/2008 2:01 1.78 1.05 1.78 1.05 1.78 737
5/17/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.15 1.79 422
5/16/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/15/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/14/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/13/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/8/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/7/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/6/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/5/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/4/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/3/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/2/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/1/2008 2:01 1.79 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 352
4/30/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/29/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/28/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/27/2008 2:01 1.79 1.04 1.79 1.05 1.79 1
4/26/2008 2:01 1.79 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.79 5820
4/25/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.1 1.6 0
4/24/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/23/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.1 1.6 0
4/22/2008 2:01 1.79 1.03 1.79 1.1 1.6 1
4/21/2008 2:01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.79 0
4/20/2008 2:01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.8 0
4/19/2008 2:01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.8 0
4/18/2008 2:01 2.04 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.8 1432
4/17/2008 2:01 2.04 2.04 2.04 1.03 1.8 0
4/16/2008 2:01 2.04 1.4 2.04 0.5 2.04 11403
4/15/2008 2:01 1.81 1.4 1.4 0.1 1.95 71
4/14/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.96 0
4/13/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.97 0
4/12/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.97 2300
4/11/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.97 0
4/10/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.99 0
4/9/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.99 0
4/8/2008 2:01 1.99 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.99 2133
4/7/2008 2:01 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.81 1.99 106
4/6/2008 2:01 1.99 1.8 1.99 1.81 1.99 5000
4/5/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.99 0
4/4/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.82 1.99 0
4/3/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.82 1.99 0
4/2/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.82 2 0
4/1/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/31/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/30/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/29/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/28/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/27/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/26/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/25/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/24/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.05 0
3/23/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.05 140
3/22/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.05 0
3/21/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.05 0
3/20/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.08 0
3/19/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.08 0
3/18/2008 2:01 2.09 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.07 350
3/17/2008 2:01 2.09 2.09 2.09 1.8 2.07 0
3/16/2008 2:01 2.09 2.09 2.09 1.8 2.07 0
3/15/2008 2:01 2.09 2.09 2.09 1.8 2.09 0
3/14/2008 2:01 2.09 2.09 2.09 1.8 2.09 0
3/13/2008 2:01 2.09 2.09 2.09 1.75 2.09 0
3/12/2008 2:01 2.09 2.09 2.09 1.75 2.09 0
3/11/2008 2:01 2.09 2.07 2.09 1.75 2.09 10852
3/10/2008 2:01 2.07 1.73 2.07 1.75 2.05 350
3/9/2008 3:00 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.75 2.06 0
3/8/2008 2:01 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.75 2.06 0
3/7/2008 2:01 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.75 2.09 0
3/6/2008 2:01 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.75 2.12 0
3/5/2008 18:28 1.76 1.73 1.73 1.75 2.12 10000
3/4/2008 1:58 2.25 1.73 1.73 1.77 2.14 5000
3/3/2008 1:58 2.25 2.25 2.25 1.75 2.14 0
3/2/2008 1:58 2.25 2.25 2.25 1.73 2.14 0
3/1/2008 1:58 2.25 2.25 2.25 1.73 2.15 0
2/29/2008 1:58 2.25 2.05 2.25 1.72 2.2 3001
2/28/2008 1:58 2.05 1.66 2.05 1.7 2.05 27002
2/27/2008 1:58 2.05 2.05 2.05 1.66 2 0
2/26/2008 1:58 2.05 2.05 2.05 1.65 2.02 0
2/25/2008 1:58 2.05 1.6 2.05 1.65 2.05 80230
2/24/2008 1:58 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.65 1.84 0
2/23/2008 1:58 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.65 1.84 0
2/22/2008 1:58 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.84 5000
2/21/2008 1:58 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.85 0
2/20/2008 1:58 1.87 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.87 2783
2/19/2008 1:58 1.86 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.86 1500
2/18/2008 1:58 1.86 1.86 1.86 1.71 1.87 0
2/17/2008 1:58 1.86 1.86 1.86 1.71 1.86 0
2/16/2008 1:58 1.86 1.7 1.86 1.71 1.86 1750
2/15/2008 1:58 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.72 1.87 0
2/14/2008 1:58 1.88 1.7 1.7 1.71 1.88 4175
2/13/2008 1:58 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.8 1.89 3931
2/12/2008 1:58 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.8 1.87 0
2/11/2008 1:58 1.88 1.8 1.88 1.8 1.87 1022
2/10/2008 1:58 1.88 1.8 1.88 1.8 1.88 1000
2/9/2008 1:58 1.84 1.75 1.8 1.8 1.84 1073
2/8/2008 1:58 1.75 1.7 1.75 1.63 1.84 5000
2/7/2008 1:58 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.88 0
2/6/2008 1:58 1.7 1.66 1.7 1.67 1.89 5000
2/5/2008 1:58 1.94 1.66 1.66 1.67 1.9 5000
2/4/2008 1:58 1.94 1.9 1.94 1.7 1.94 36
2/3/2008 1:58 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.94 921
2/2/2008 1:58 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.9 0
2/1/2008 1:58 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.9 0
1/31/2008 1:58 1.9 1.5 1.9 1.55 1.9 79
1/30/2008 1:58 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.55 1.94 0
1/29/2008 1:58 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.55 1.94 0
1/28/2008 1:58 1.66 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.94 153



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:24:32 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13704 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943 That would be 1.56


Price History
LLL: L&L Rentals and Sales
Date High Low Close Bid Ask Volume
5/29/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/28/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/27/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/26/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/25/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/24/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/23/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.78 0
5/22/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.78 0
5/21/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 0
5/20/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 0
5/19/2008 2:01 1.78 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 500
5/18/2008 2:01 1.78 1.05 1.78 1.05 1.78 737
5/17/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.15 1.79 422
5/16/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/15/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/14/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/13/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/8/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/7/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/6/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/5/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/4/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/3/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/2/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/1/2008 2:01 1.79 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 352
4/30/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/29/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/28/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/27/2008 2:01 1.79 1.04 1.79 1.05 1.79 1
4/26/2008 2:01 1.79 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.79 5820
4/25/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.1 1.6 0
4/24/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/23/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.1 1.6 0
4/22/2008 2:01 1.79 1.03 1.79 1.1 1.6 1
4/21/2008 2:01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.79 0
4/20/2008 2:01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.8 0
4/19/2008 2:01 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.8 0
4/18/2008 2:01 2.04 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.8 1432
4/17/2008 2:01 2.04 2.04 2.04 1.03 1.8 0
4/16/2008 2:01 2.04 1.4 2.04 0.5 2.04 11403
4/15/2008 2:01 1.81 1.4 1.4 0.1 1.95 71
4/14/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.96 0
4/13/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.97 0
4/12/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.97 2300
4/11/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.97 0
4/10/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.99 0
4/9/2008 2:01 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.99 0
4/8/2008 2:01 1.99 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.99 2133
4/7/2008 2:01 1.99 1.99 1.99 1.81 1.99 106
4/6/2008 2:01 1.99 1.8 1.99 1.81 1.99 5000
4/5/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.99 0
4/4/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.82 1.99 0
4/3/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.82 1.99 0
4/2/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.82 2 0
4/1/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/31/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/30/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/29/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/28/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0
3/27/2008 2:01 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 0



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:20:52 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13703 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
What do the LCA and LNL shareholders think? Hold on, you just ignore them.

It is very sad to say, but your companies have become one big joke!



in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:19:17 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13702 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
The LLFS website was down at the beginning of the month due to a server migration so it is not really fair to do a 30 day average because 30 days of accurate data is not available.

in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 09:11:20 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13701 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943
Can you tell us how you arrived at 1.78 for LLL?

The average closing price for the last 30 days was 1.41

Price History
LLL: L&L Rentals and Sales
Date High Low Close Bid Ask Volume
5/29/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/28/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/27/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/26/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/25/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/24/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.8 0
5/23/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.78 0
5/22/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.06 1.78 0
5/21/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 0
5/20/2008 2:01 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 0
5/19/2008 2:01 1.78 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.78 500
5/18/2008 2:01 1.78 1.05 1.78 1.05 1.78 737
5/17/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.15 1.79 422
5/16/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/15/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/14/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/13/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/8/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/7/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/6/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/5/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/4/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/3/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/2/2008 2:01 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 0
5/1/2008 2:01 1.79 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 352
4/30/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/29/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/28/2008 2:01 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.05 1.6 0
4/27/2008 2:01 1.79 1.04 1.79 1.05 1.79 1
4/26/2008 2:01 1.79 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.79 5820





in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Scott Nestler ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 08:58:15 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943 As stated, I am posting the conversion schedule for L&L Corporation based on the LLL price at $1.78/share. This schedule should be finalized within a day or so as I work to post the share allotments.

L&L Financial Liquidation Fund at $1/share = 2/1 conversion to LLC
L&L Rentals and Sales at $1.78/share = 1/1 conversion to LLC
L&L Credit Reporting at $.43/share (30 day average) = 4/1 conversion to LLC
L&L Financial Services at $.35/share (30 day average) = 5/1 converstion to LLC
L&L Financial Services outstanding at $1/share = 2/1 conversion to LLC
L&L Credit Reporting oustanding at $1/share = 2/1 conversion to LLC

This will be posted in the forums for discussion should there be any questions or adjustments needed. We expect to have the L&L Corporation Forums up and running within a day or so. The L&L Corporation website has been taken offline for rebranding. LLFS and LCA website are still holding for the rebrand as well. We expect to have most of the changes made this weekend to start open trading on LLC next week.

Sincerely,

Lindsay Druart, COO
L&L Corporation
lindsay.druart@llcorporationinc.com


in topic Preliminary Conversion Schedule by Lindsay Druart ]]> Thu, 29 May 2008 08:36:51 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1943/13698 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925
I agree with the previous post that LNLF was set up as a liquidation fund, and as such, the "shares" are not really shares in a company. Just because some people panicked, or others tried to be opportunists and sold and bought shares for ridiculously low values (the last transaction was for 693 shares at 0.03!!), should not be used to punish the rest of us who saw the "shares" for what they were, a liquidation fund.

Keep in mind that many people have alternates on here. It is quite possible that someone even sold to themselves at 0.03 in order to devalue the "shares".

I would suggest that the fairest and most ethical thing to do is to do the conversion based on your original promise to not go below $1/share.



in topic Liquidation Fund by Givara Balnarring ]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 08:06:09 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13649 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925
in topic Liquidation Fund by Bario Waydelich ]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 05:40:36 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13645 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925 thank you for your fast answer.
I think that the right conversation,by e way LNLF value is supposed to be 1.02,or 1.03 for the Capex commissions should be 0,68-0,69.Remeber that it is not a share,but a fund.
For Ancapex:do they answer to the tickets?Really?:)))

Good work

in topic Liquidation Fund by Bario Waydelich ]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 05:38:45 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13642 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925
As far as ACE, I have submitted the ticket several times. I will go to Intlibber directly.

in topic Liquidation Fund by Lindsay Druart ]]> Tue, 27 May 2008 04:48:03 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13640 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925 I think that a 90 day average have NO ethical sense,and NO logical sense.
You wrote that anyone sell beyond 1 L$.
I put money in a bank that freezed my account,converted my moneys in to shares and change my shares in other shares.
The 90 day average means a loss of 50% of value.
Without considering that the new shares will have a loss of 30-40% of its value,and you know.
So this means a loss of 80% of my moneys.
And this is a your choice,not a LL choice.
P.s.:ACE is up,my 25000 SLIB shares?

Thank you in advance for your answers

in topic Liquidation Fund by Bario Waydelich ]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 23:19:48 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13638 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925
in topic Liquidation Fund by Lindsay Druart ]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 19:43:42 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13634 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925
I'm just curious as to what kind of share conversion will be used to move the Liquidation Fund shares into the LNC shares.

I ask because the LNLF share value has plummeted since it was started. The last value is something like .03 per share. They are almost worthless compared to the original value.

in topic Liquidation Fund by Givara Balnarring ]]> Mon, 26 May 2008 11:21:31 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13624 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925
in topic Liquidation Fund by Lindsay Druart ]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 05:50:46 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13505 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925 if I understand what you write,the liquidation fund will be converted into LLC.Is it right?
And will it be quoted in Capex.....
Tell me if it's right

Thank you in advance and good work.....

in topic Liquidation Fund by Bario Waydelich ]]> Fri, 23 May 2008 04:30:39 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1925/13504 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906
in topic L&L - Refusing To Repay New Depositors by Lindsay Druart ]]> Wed, 21 May 2008 06:42:39 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906/13422 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/268 http://lindsaydruart.blogspot.com/2008/05/future-of-l-brand.html

in topic Official Weekly Update - For CEO Posting Only by Lindsay Druart ]]> Wed, 21 May 2008 06:39:44 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/268/13421 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906
in topic L&L - Refusing To Repay New Depositors by Cayman Beaumont ]]> Tue, 20 May 2008 10:36:33 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906/13399 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1908 into my accounts. I don't want the shares sold for peanuts and perhaps get some funds back. Is there anyone else in the same position holding brokerage shares?

in topic L&L Brokerage stock holdings by William Rustamova ]]> Tue, 20 May 2008 10:22:10 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1908/13398 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906
Seems that every one didn't get Linden Labs notices and for a few days banks did still get deposits.

Remember the ATM withdrawal limits were set, not deposit.

When JTF stopped withdrawls activity on CapEx was still happening and if you wanted to inject lindens to take advantage the ATM's did allow deposits.

-Scott

in topic L&L - Refusing To Repay New Depositors by Scott Nestler ]]> Tue, 20 May 2008 09:45:32 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906/13397 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906
in topic L&L - Refusing To Repay New Depositors by Sportsbets Writer ]]> Mon, 19 May 2008 21:38:35 -0700 http://slcapex.com/forums/topic/LNL/1906/13387